Like the other comment alludes, her demeanor and filler words do not inspire confidence. Wish they had a more succinct and experienced attorney to replace her in the Chauvin trial. Seemed to take forever to make simple points, in over her head, should not have been given this assignment.

Most most annoying voice no personality terrible prosecution skills ...agree with all above...

During her cross examination of witnesses in Chauvin trial. she has a very irksome problem with constantly say UM Um Um .To me it seems like lack of preparedness. Someone should point this out to her.

Very poor in Chauvin trial, please replace her - she is fumbling, nervous, has no clear direction, keeps asking leading questions, says "um" constantly and missed opportunities to ask revealing questions. Please do justice for George Floyd and put in a more competent, effective trial attorney who knows what points they are trying to make through their questioning.

She has difficulty asking a simple question. Appears overwhelmed in Court

Doing a good job laying out the facts. With the video evidence witnesses are merely confirming what is already known. Prosecution is just aligning the facts. So far so good, the defense don't have a case and are merely looking at diminished responsibility.

So glad to see I'm not the ONLY one frustrated with this prosecutor! She seems to lack the ability to sustain a clear and precise line of questioning.

PLEASE sit her down!!!

Erin Eldridge seems nervous, unprepared, amateurish, very 'green' in cross examination, regularly scratching her face and hair. Does not inspire confidence. Needs to be replaced with a more seasoned attorney, male or female.

Agree with all the other reviews. Can't ask a simple question. Very annoying.

I agree with each of the previous comments. She seems nervous and not in command of her line of questioning and constantly has to touch her face after each question which to me seems to demonstrate her being nervous and unsure of herself. For the sake of this case, the Prosecution should consider reducing her role in the questioning of witnesses moving forward.